Serveur d'exploration sur la recherche en informatique en Lorraine

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Computerised Test Interpretation Services: Ethical and Professional Concerns Regarding U.S. Producers and Users

Identifieur interne : 00E625 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 00E624; suivant : 00E626

Computerised Test Interpretation Services: Ethical and Professional Concerns Regarding U.S. Producers and Users

Auteurs : Lorraine Dittrich Eyde [États-Unis] ; Dennis M. Kowal [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:99226526605508D702416189E6B6CDA36655B0D5

English descriptors

Abstract

This article focuses on consumer issues arising from the impact of advances in computer technology on the use of psychological assessments. It describes how the widespread use of microcomputers and minicomputers and the development of software for interpreting complex diagnostic and pre‐employment tests of a clinical nature, coupled with the growing demand for cost‐effective clinical assessment, has led to increased use of computer‐based test interpretations by health care professionals. Although these interpretations offer advantages, they also carry a potential for misuse. The authors make recommendations for professional self‐regulation to strengthen the gatekeeper function of controlling access to clinical assessment tools. Cet article s'intéresse aux préoccupations des utilisateurs nées de ľ impact des progrés de ľ informatique sur la pratique de ľévaluation psychologique. On y décrit comment ľ usage généralisé des mini‐ et micrc‐ordinateurs ainsi que le développement des logiciels dans ľ interprétation des diagnostics complexes et des tests de sélection de nature clinique, associéà la demande croissante ď une évaluation clinique efficace au meilleur coût, a amené de plus en plus les spécialistes de la santéà exploiter les interprétations de tests par ordinateur. Cette solution présente des avantages, mais aussi des risques ď abus. Les auteurs recommandent aux spécialistes de renforcer eux‐mêmes le contrôle du droit ď accés aux outils ďévaluation clinique.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1987.tb01200.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Computerised Test Interpretation Services: Ethical and Professional Concerns Regarding U.S. Producers and Users</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Eyde, Lorraine Dittrich" sort="Eyde, Lorraine Dittrich" uniqKey="Eyde L" first="Lorraine Dittrich" last="Eyde">Lorraine Dittrich Eyde</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kowal, Dennis M" sort="Kowal, Dennis M" uniqKey="Kowal D" first="Dennis M." last="Kowal">Dennis M. Kowal</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:99226526605508D702416189E6B6CDA36655B0D5</idno>
<date when="1987" year="1987">1987</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1464-0597.1987.tb01200.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-P7JC8NGX-5/fulltext.pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002378</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002378</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002347</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003554</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003554</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0269-994X:1987:Eyde L:computerised:test:interpretation</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00EF12</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">00E625</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">00E625</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Computerised Test Interpretation Services: Ethical and Professional Concerns Regarding U.S. Producers and Users</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Eyde, Lorraine Dittrich" sort="Eyde, Lorraine Dittrich" uniqKey="Eyde L" first="Lorraine Dittrich" last="Eyde">Lorraine Dittrich Eyde</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Washington</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Washington (État)</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kowal, Dennis M" sort="Kowal, Dennis M" uniqKey="Kowal D" first="Dennis M." last="Kowal">Dennis M. Kowal</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of the Army, Washington</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Washington (État)</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Applied Psychology</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0269-994X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1464-0597</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">36</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3‐4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="401">401</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="417">417</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">17</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1987-07">1987-07</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0269-994X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0269-994X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>American psychologist</term>
<term>Association committee</term>
<term>Automation techniques</term>
<term>Behavioural medicine</term>
<term>Broad range</term>
<term>Clinical assessment</term>
<term>Clinical assessment tools</term>
<term>Computer</term>
<term>Computer interpretations</term>
<term>Computer technology</term>
<term>Computerised</term>
<term>Computerised test interpretation</term>
<term>Computerised test interpretations</term>
<term>Computerized</term>
<term>Computerized reports</term>
<term>Configural rules</term>
<term>Correctional officers</term>
<term>Current opinions</term>
<term>Decision rules</term>
<term>Diagnostic testing</term>
<term>Enforcement academy</term>
<term>Ethical issues</term>
<term>Ethical principle</term>
<term>Ethical principles</term>
<term>Ethical standards</term>
<term>Ethics committee</term>
<term>Eyde</term>
<term>Gain access</term>
<term>Gatekeeper function</term>
<term>Guidance materials</term>
<term>Health care professionals</term>
<term>Interim standards</term>
<term>Interpretation practices</term>
<term>Judicial council</term>
<term>Kowal</term>
<term>Large number</term>
<term>Largest health care system</term>
<term>Legal intervention</term>
<term>Linear models</term>
<term>Medical ethics</term>
<term>Mental health</term>
<term>Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory</term>
<term>Minnesota report</term>
<term>National computer systems</term>
<term>National council</term>
<term>National institute</term>
<term>Organisation</term>
<term>Other evidence</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Personal communication</term>
<term>Personality assessment</term>
<term>Personnel management</term>
<term>Personnel selection system</term>
<term>Professional competence</term>
<term>Professional concerns</term>
<term>Professional practice</term>
<term>Professional practices</term>
<term>Professional standards</term>
<term>Provider</term>
<term>Psychological assessment</term>
<term>Psychological assessments</term>
<term>Psychological bulletin</term>
<term>Psychological community</term>
<term>Psychological risk</term>
<term>Psychological services</term>
<term>Psychological testing</term>
<term>Psychological tests</term>
<term>Psychologist</term>
<term>Research association</term>
<term>Retail outlets</term>
<term>Software</term>
<term>State psychology boards</term>
<term>Task force</term>
<term>Test administration</term>
<term>Test distribution</term>
<term>Test interpretations</term>
<term>Test materials</term>
<term>Test misuse</term>
<term>Test publishers</term>
<term>Test results</term>
<term>Test standards</term>
<term>Test takers</term>
<term>Test user</term>
<term>Test user qualifications</term>
<term>Test users</term>
<term>Train doctors</term>
<term>User</term>
<term>User qualifications</term>
<term>Voluntary system</term>
<term>Wall street journal</term>
<term>Wide range</term>
<term>Wide variety</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article focuses on consumer issues arising from the impact of advances in computer technology on the use of psychological assessments. It describes how the widespread use of microcomputers and minicomputers and the development of software for interpreting complex diagnostic and pre‐employment tests of a clinical nature, coupled with the growing demand for cost‐effective clinical assessment, has led to increased use of computer‐based test interpretations by health care professionals. Although these interpretations offer advantages, they also carry a potential for misuse. The authors make recommendations for professional self‐regulation to strengthen the gatekeeper function of controlling access to clinical assessment tools. Cet article s'intéresse aux préoccupations des utilisateurs nées de ľ impact des progrés de ľ informatique sur la pratique de ľévaluation psychologique. On y décrit comment ľ usage généralisé des mini‐ et micrc‐ordinateurs ainsi que le développement des logiciels dans ľ interprétation des diagnostics complexes et des tests de sélection de nature clinique, associéà la demande croissante ď une évaluation clinique efficace au meilleur coût, a amené de plus en plus les spécialistes de la santéà exploiter les interprétations de tests par ordinateur. Cette solution présente des avantages, mais aussi des risques ď abus. Les auteurs recommandent aux spécialistes de renforcer eux‐mêmes le contrôle du droit ď accés aux outils ďévaluation clinique.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Washington (État)</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<region name="Washington (État)">
<name sortKey="Eyde, Lorraine Dittrich" sort="Eyde, Lorraine Dittrich" uniqKey="Eyde L" first="Lorraine Dittrich" last="Eyde">Lorraine Dittrich Eyde</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Kowal, Dennis M" sort="Kowal, Dennis M" uniqKey="Kowal D" first="Dennis M." last="Kowal">Dennis M. Kowal</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Lorraine/explor/InforLorV4/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00E625 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 00E625 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Lorraine
   |area=    InforLorV4
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:99226526605508D702416189E6B6CDA36655B0D5
   |texte=   Computerised Test Interpretation Services: Ethical and Professional Concerns Regarding U.S. Producers and Users
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Jun 10 21:56:28 2019. Site generation: Fri Feb 25 15:29:27 2022